ACEC California Names Senator Pat Bates 2016 Legislator of the Year

bates-patriciaSenator Patricia Bates (R – Laguna Niguel), a strong supporter of the design professional community, has been selected by ACEC California as its 2016 Legislator of the Year. Each year, ACEC California members recognize a member of the Legislature for his or her commitment and demonstrated political courage on public policy issues important to the engineering and land surveying industries.

“Senator Bates understands the complexities of our industry,” said Jeff Walker, of Kleinfelder and ACEC California President. “She has consistently demonstrated leadership on issues of importance to us and has risen as a champion in many ways, including standing in support of reform to uninsurable contractual requirements.”

“It is an honor to be recognized by ACEC California and its membership of consulting engineering and land surveying professionals,” said Senator Bates. “I share ACEC California’s mission of building a better California and appreciate opportunities to work with ACEC California to achieve that mission in the state legislature.”

Senator Bates demonstrated her support of efficient and effective infrastructure delivery options by authoring Senate Bill 901. SB 901 would have created the Advanced Mitigation Program in the Department of Transportation to implement environmental mitigation measures in advance of future transportation projects.

SB 901 promoted flexibility in the application of CEQA to transportation projects without sacrificing substantive environmental protections. Given the enormity of our state’s transportation infrastructure needs, ACEC California believes it is critical to consider innovative mechanisms to deliver projects as quickly as possible and strongly supported Senator Bates’ legislative effort.

ACEC California is pleased to present Senator Bates with its Legislator of the Year award this year and looks forward to working with her in the future.




Road Charge Pilot Program: Statements and Social Questions

Road Charge Pilot Program: Statements and Social Questions
By Kelly Garman, Director of Government Affairs

**This is the fifth blog post I have written since being enrolled in California’s Road Charge Pilot Program. To read the first four posts, please click here, here and here, and here.**

ca-road-charge-logoI continue to be fascinated by the mechanics of this pilot program. I’ve now received two monthly statements, both showing that if this road charge program were fully implemented, I would be saving money.

In other words, according to the results of this pilot program, I am currently paying more tax on gas when I fill up my 24 gallon Toyota Sequoia than I would be if I didn’t have to pay at the pump and was solely “billed” at a rate of 1.8 cents per mile (which, according to the information found on my statement, is the equivalent to the five year historical average of California fuel excise taxes).

Click here to view my –
August statement
September statement

The idea of being “billed” to drive is something worth discussing. Currently, I fill up my tank every 10 days or so, not differentiating in the slightest the money I spend to actually pay for the cost of each gallon of gas and the money I spend that is handed over to the state of California to support transportation infrastructure (the taxes I pay at the pump). It isn’t broken out on the pump’s screen, detailing where the $60.00 ends up. My checking account simply says how much I paid, and frankly that is all I have ever paid attention to.

Now that I see how much I would be paying per mile (should this pilot program be fully implemented) and how much each individual trip costs me (something I have never tracked before), I wonder if such information would change travel behavior for the general public. On one hand, paying for gas at the physical pump would be less expensive. Would my mind cheer and not cringe when filling up my tank?

On the other hand, the idea of receiving a bill, in the mail or electronically, for the miles I drove in the previous month makes me question the consumer’s appetite for such a thing. While currently the gas tax is sort of hidden, I wonder how Californians would react to receiving a bill, seeking payment.

The road charge pilot program is a significant societal shift. And the more I talk with others about my participation, the more I understand the importance of addressing early certain concerns that the every day, non-political driver is raising. I think I’ll talk more about the things I am hearing from others in my next post.

As a reminder, the California Road Charge Pilot Program has a comprehensive website, and I encourage you to review it, including the FAQ page.


ACEC California Scholarship Foundation Opens Applications to Students

It’s here! The ACEC California Scholarship Foundation has announced that applications are now being accepted for the 2017-2018 academic year. Each year, ACEC California’s Scholarship Foundation seeks to help bright, motivated engineering and land-surveying students attain their academic goals. These students must be enrolled in California universities in order to receive support through scholarship foundation awards.

Continue reading

ACEC California Joins Broad Coalition to Oppose Measure That Will Impede California Infrastructure Projects

share-no-prop53ACEC California has partnered with more than 200 organizations including firefighters, paramedics, family farmers, small business owners, environmentalists, nurses, cities, counties, local water districts and law enforcement to oppose Proposition 53, a harmful measure that will threaten infrastructure projects in California.

“ACEC California members know that infrastructure systems– transportation, water, education – are critical to our future economic success. That is why we are opposing Prop 53, which jeopardizes our ability to repair or expand outdated infrastructure systems. Our communities already suffer from massive backlogs of local infrastructure needs, including outdated water supply and delivery systems, unsafe bridges, overpasses and freeways, and community hospitals that require earthquake retrofits. Prop 53 would exacerbate and extend this backlog to the detriment of all Californians,” said Brad Diede, Executive Director of ACEC California.

Prop 53 is a misguided measure that erodes local control and will impede large infrastructure projects by forcing statewide votes on some local and state projects that require revenue bonds. Should Prop 53 pass, the measure will directly disrupt the local and state ability to build or improve critically needed infrastructure investments by forcing a statewide vote on some larger infrastructure projects. This would tack on unnecessary delays and expense to critically needed public works projects, forcing state and local governments to potentially wait as long as two additional years to begin projects, such as fixing and repairing roadways and bridges, hospitals, or water supply and delivery systems. Further, Prop 53 contains no exemptions for emergencies such as natural disasters.

ACEC California is urging its members to vote No on Prop 53. Visit for more information and to sign up to oppose this harmful measure.

Vote Yes on Prop. 51 To Ensure A Skilled Workforce, Protect Economy

YProp51Proposition 51 is a statewide school facilities bond which will provide badly needed resources to K-12 and community college school districts to repair classrooms and provide safe schools for all students. Prop. 51 is essential to ensuring students have equitable access to quality learning environments, and creating a skilled and educated workforce. That’s why the American Council of Engineering Companies, California has endorsed Prop. 51 and are encouraging our members to do the same. It has been a decade since California last authorized a statewide school bond to upgrade or build new neighborhood schools. State funding is virtually depleted, and there is a growing $2 billion backlog of local school district that have applied for state matching funds in order to make needed health and safety repairs like removing hazardous materials from school campuses, replacing temporary classrooms, completing seismic retrofits, and building new schools to relieve overcrowding.

Continue reading

Road Charge Pilot Program: Data Points and Changing Behavior

Road Charge Pilot Program: Data Points and Changing Behavior
By Kelly Garman, Director of Government Affairs

**This is the fourth blog post I have written since being enrolled in California’s Road Charge Pilot Program. To read the first three posts, please click here, here and here**

It’s been 27 days since my last post, and in that time, I’ve done a lot of driving. Not only did I take a trip up to Chico (my first long drive since starting the pilot program), but due to kids and soccer and a relatively unsystematic approach to the summer months, there have been multiple extra trips around town.

As I drive, whether short or long distances, I find my mind wandering to the little green Azuga dongle plugged in under my dashboard. Did you know that more than my miles are being recorded? I purposefully chose a device that did not include GPS tracking, but as it turns out, there is still a great deal of data being collected.

As a pilot program participant, I have access to a cool, easy-to-understand online dashboard that reflects my travels-


Continue reading

California WaterFix Hearings

This week, the California State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) began Part 1 of a two-part hearing regarding the California WaterFix project. Without the approval of the Water Board, the WaterFix project cannot move forward, which will leave California’s water system inefficient and ineffective.

The purpose of the public hearings is for the Water Board to hear evidence in order to determine if it should approve a joint petition from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The petition proposes to add three new points of diversion and/or points of rediversion of water to specified water right permits for the State Water Project and the Central Valley Project associated with the California WaterFix Project. (See graphic below)

Part 1 of the hearing process began in Sacramento this week and is expected to take several months. The hearings are narrowly focused to take evidence and answer two questions – Do the new points of diversion alter water flows or affect water quality such that there would be injury to any legal user of the water? Does the project in effect initiate a new water right? The public hearings are drawing great public interest as they will determine if the Governor’s proposal to modernize the state’s water delivery system – known as California WaterFix – will move forward.

DWR has presented evidence showing that the proposed change will neither initiate a new water right nor injure any other legal user of water. DWR’s key points include:

  • WaterFix would create more flexibility to better balance water quality and water supply.
  • DWR and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation do not seek a new or expanded water right or any modifications to the water quality standards upstream or downstream of the proposed diversion points.
  • DWR has a proven track record of meeting the Water Board’s Delta water quality standards and WaterFix would operate within the standards established by the Water Board. Meeting existing or future water quality standards would be easier with the flexibility provided by California WaterFix.
  • WaterFix will be operated in real-time. While modeling can perform an assessment of potential water operation effects, water project operators handle complex situations on a daily basis to stay in compliance with water quality standards.

Part 2 of the hearings is expected to begin in early 2017 and will address fish and wildlife, recreation, and other public trust issues.


Road Charge Pilot Program: It Works!

Road Charge Pilot Program: It Works!
By Kelly Garman, Director of Government Affairs

UntitledIt’s official! As your friendly Road Charge Pilot Program participant blogger, I am finally connected and being tracked! It’s been a long road to this point, as you can read here, but Azuga took notice and went above and beyond to fix the problem for me. In fact, I was really impressed with the level of customer service, once it became apparent that the initial device I received wasn’t going to work. Good job, Azuga!

To be honest, the level of engagement with Azuga has peaked my curiosity – What is the history of this company? Did they work with Oregon (who recently launched their own Road Charge Program)? Are they based in California? Who developed the technology to monitor my miles?

But I digress…kelly

Azuga overnighted to me a new device and after reading the easy-to-understand instructions, I plugged it in. Within minutes, I got an email saying the device was active. Yeah!

The timing of this initial connection was perfect because I needed to fill up my gas tank. While the State of California tracks my mileage, I’ve decided to keep tabs on how much I really am paying at the pump. On July 17th, I filled up my tank with 22.6 gallons, paying $53.31.

Continue reading

Road Charge Pilot Program Preparation


Road Charge Pilot Program Preparation
By Kelly Garman, Director of Government Affairs

I’ve had a bit of a frustrating start to my participation in the Road Charge Pilot Program, but I remain hopeful that it will be resolved shortly so I can actually participate in the program. Below is a timeline of my first week, in preparation of the actual launch of the program on July 1st.

 June 29 – I received in the mail the Azuga device that will plug into my vehicle and wirelessly report my mileage. I hadn’t requested a device that uses GPS (I had a choice when I enrolled), but I admit that there was a small twinge of anxiety as I opened the box and saw this little green electronic device, just waiting for me to plug it in.

I understand the privacy concerns raised by many regarding the government tracking my miles, but I have also had many conversations with Malcolm Dougherty, Director of Caltrans, and trust that the Road Charge Task Force will, in fact, do all they can to protect my private information, as the government does with other information collected, including addresses, social security numbers, drivers license information, etc… Furthermore, with my smartphone, I use Strava GPS to track my runs, WAZE to tell me how to beat the traffic to work and Uber when I am out of town but need to get around. I’m already being tracked (and, odds are, so are you if you use smartphone applications).

Still, I made the decision not to give Azuga and the state of California the ability to locate my vehicle during this pilot program.

Continue reading

The Legislature Breaks For Summer – Progress Yet to Be Made On Transportation

o-DRIVERS-TRAFFIC-facebookIt is July 1st and the Legislature is officially out of session until August 1st when the Legislature reconvenes. While the Legislature has taken a number of actions that have garnered significant attention – gun control, new Managed Care Organization tax, and a $176 billion budget – progress on a transportation funding package has been elusive.

This past week, the Governor signed a balanced budget, but the subcommittees in both the Assembly and the Senate shifted the Governor’s proposed $3.6 billion transportation and funding reform package back down to the policy process and did not include the proposals in the budget. This means that we hope to see some movement in August to ensure that badly needed transportation system maintenance funding is addressed.

Of course, even as the Legislature and Governor work together to create a comprehensive funding package, it’s important to remember that whatever package might emerge, it will continue to be a short-term fix. The good news is however, that there will be several local transportation measures on the ballot in November that hopefully will pass. And there are long-term solutions in development to address not only fully funded maintenance, but also capacity. To read more about the Road Charge Pilot program, click here.